(416) 658-1818free case evaluation 1

Ontario Courts Are in Need of Technological Updates

Many criminal defence lawyers, crown counsel, Justices and court staff have been subject to the…
criminal information
JP Photos Dec2019 046 4
This article was written by the staff at Pyzer Criminal Lawyers, and reviewed by Jonathan Pyzer
Jonathan Pyzer Criminal Defence Lawyer (B.A., L.L.B.)
Fingerprints with a hammer and a magnifying glass
Fingerprints with a hammer and a magnifying glass

Many criminal defence lawyers, crown counsel, justices, and court staff in Ontario have been subject to the delay and difficulty caused by the system of maintaining information on paper. This outdated method is in dire need of modernization, like organizing them in a computer database.

In Canada, Information identifies the charges that an accused person is facing under the Criminal Code, either by summary or by indictment. The Information contains an allegation that an offence or offences have been committed by the accused. This vital document spells out the charge or charges, along with past and future court dates for the accused, all on just a few pieces of paper. 

If Information is not present in court on the date that the accused’s matter is before the court, the matter cannot be heard, leading to unnecessary delays and inefficiency in the court proceedings. The impact of these setbacks could be greatly reduced if the information were organized and made easily accessible on a computer database, instead of being trapped on physical paper.

The system of maintaining paper Information is undeniably archaic and is solely responsible for significantly slowing down the criminal court process.

Impact of R v. Jordan on Criminal Proceedings

Delays have turned into a pressing issue for people facing criminal offence charges. The importance of this was highlighted after the Supreme Court of Canada’s 2016 ruling R v. Jordan. 

Setting Strict Timelines for Criminal Trials

With the ruling in this case, the Supreme Court set strict timelines to bring criminal cases to trial – 18 months in provincial court and 30 months in Superior Court. If a case of an accused person is delayed as a result of the Crown or Court beyond the time limits set out in Jordan, it is considered a violation of the accused’s legal right to be tried within a reasonable time. 

This right is guaranteed under Section 11(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which states that any person charged with an offence has the right to be tried within a reasonable time. 

Implications of Delayed Trials on Accused Persons

Any violation of rights under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms can cause criminal offence charges against an accused stay. A Stay of Proceedings is the most drastic remedy available to a court. As the Supreme Court of Canada stated: “Charges that are stayed may never be prosecuted; an alleged victim will never get his or her day in court; society will never have the matter resolved by a trier of fact. For these reasons, a stay is reserved for only those cases of abuse where a very high threshold is met.”

Therefore, in a case involving an 11(b) violation, the accused must have a skilled criminal defence lawyer to demonstrate that the delay in their case was due to the fault of the crown or the court, rather than any fault of the accused.

Technological Improvements for Efficiency in Ontario’s Legal System

In order to combat these issues, modernization efforts are crucial and would improve delays in remand courts significantly. These efforts would go beyond just reorganizing information into a database instead of relying on physical paper documents. 

The responsibility to ensure this modernization lies with the Ontario Provincial government. As the body responsible for funding the courts, the Ontario Provincial government would be in charge of any changes made to the system.

The Criminal Lawyers Association has been a vocal advocate for technological improvements within the courts. They have made valuable suggestions to encourage changes in the system. These include allowing criminal defence lawyers to conduct digital or virtual court appearances through email. This method can save time and space in court and helps cases move forward more efficiently.

In addition, the Criminal Lawyers Association has put forward the idea that disclosure should be made available online. This would be done through a secure server, accessible to the criminal defence lawyers. They would also receive notifications when a new disclosure has been added to the server. 

Know your rights! If you need help with criminal charges, Toronto Defence Lawyers are ready to assist. They have defended young offenders successfully since 2003 and are available for consultations.

jonathan pyzer member page
Jonathan Pyzer

Jonathan Pyzer, B.A., L.L.B., is an experienced criminal defence lawyer and distinguished alumnus of McGill University and the University of Western Ontario. As the founder of Pyzer Criminal Lawyers, he brings over two decades of experience to his practice, having successfully represented hundreds of clients facing criminal charges throughout Toronto.

Request a Free Case Evaluation
Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
cc470f88f44623e089d029d5d82ac01a721de89d3e234a07e395b544cdd7994e1e84f089a5134fc9a05a79762569fb172ca78c4ba562437528f7224ab60d4de8d5188cec925a9f154dcee647500bae18 215875d5fcc6be39e83c230aba39ce05e6dc5ab4b

5.0

Request a Free Case Evaluation

Request Free Case Evaluation (#7)
Call Us 24/7